Steven Furtick is the founding pastor of Elevation Church, a megachurch in Charlotte, North Carolina. Elevation Church is one of the fastest-growing churches in the United States, and Furtick is one of the most popular and influential pastors in the country.
In 2013, Furtick began building a 16,000-square-foot mansion in Waxhaw, North Carolina. The house is located on a 19-acre property and includes five bedrooms, seven bathrooms, a basement, an attic, a garage, and a porch.
The construction of Furtick’s house was met with controversy. Some people criticized Furtick for living in such a large and expensive home, while others defended his right to do so.
This blog post will examine the controversy surrounding Steven Furtick’s house. We will look at the arguments for and against Furtick’s decision to build such a large and expensive home, and we will also consider the implications of his decision for the church and for society as a whole.
Arguments for Furtick’s decision:
- Furtick is a successful pastor and businessman. Elevation Church is one of the largest and most successful churches in the United States, and Furtick has written several bestselling books. He is also a popular speaker and evangelist.
- Furtick is not using church funds to pay for his house. He is using his personal income to pay for the house, which he has earned from his books, speaking engagements, and other business ventures.
- Furtick has the right to live in whatever kind of house he wants. He has worked hard for his money, and he is free to spend it as he sees fit.
- Furtick’s house is a blessing to his family and to the community. The house is a place where Furtick and his family can relax and spend time together. It is also a place where Furtick can host events for church members and community leaders.
Arguments against Furtick’s decision:
- Furtick’s house is too large and expensive. It is difficult to justify living in such a large and expensive home, especially when there are so many people in the world who are struggling to make ends meet.
- Furtick’s house sets a bad example for other pastors and church leaders. It sends the message that it is okay for pastors to live a lavish lifestyle, even if it means using church funds to do so.
- Furtick’s house undermines the credibility of the church. The church is supposed to be a place where people can come to learn about Jesus Christ and to receive spiritual help. However, when pastors are living in luxury homes, it can make it difficult for people to take the church seriously.
- Furtick’s house is a distraction from the mission of the church. The church is supposed to be focused on helping people and making a difference in the world. However, when pastors are more focused on building their own personal empires, it can take away from the mission of the church.
Implications for the church and for society:
- The controversy surrounding Furtick’s house has damaged the reputation of the church. Many people are now questioning the motives of pastors and church leaders. This could make it more difficult for churches to reach people with the gospel.
- The controversy surrounding Furtick’s house has also raised questions about the role of money in the church. Some people are now wondering whether churches are more focused on making money than they are on helping people. This could lead to a decline in church attendance and giving.
- The controversy surrounding Furtick’s house has also highlighted the growing inequality between the rich and the poor in the United States. It is difficult to justify pastors living in luxury homes, while so many people are struggling to make ends meet. This inequality could lead to social unrest and instability.
Conclusion:
The controversy surrounding Steven Furtick’s house is a complex one. There are valid arguments on both sides of the issue.
Ultimately, it is up to each individual to decide whether or not they believe that Furtick’s decision to build such a large and expensive home was justified. However, it is important to be aware of the arguments for and against Furtick’s decision, as well as the implications of his decision for the church and for society as a whole.
